These ARMED men are NOT using toy guns....they are ready to kill anyone that tries to remove them.
They are protesting the conviction of two ranchers who set fire to federal land because they said they were protecting their property.

Those convicted men, part of the Hammond family  were convicted of arson and though they disagreed with the conviction, are willingly reporting to federal prison to serve their time. They have also distanced themselves from these so-called protesters that have taken over this federal building in Oregon..

This so called militia group, broke into the building and stated they are not leaving. They have threatened to kill anyone,who tries to remove them from the property.

I repeat...its not going to end well for them...And before the shooting starts and innocent people die, they need to be stopped..
 

esm wrote:

Ruby Ridge, Waco........

Word!!
 

I say leave them out there until the spring. Why risk lives and manpower to toss them out of a building no one seems to be using? They are desperate for a confrontation; why give it to them?

AdminShiny wrote:

I say leave them out there until the spring. Why risk lives and manpower to toss them out of a building no one seems to be using? They are desperate for a confrontation; why give it to them?

I agree, cut their power and their phone and their access to utilities and let them hang out all winter.  They want a deadlyconfrontation more than anything. Except snacks. they've already put it out on the inter webs that they would like some snacks. 
 

esm wrote:

Spunky wrote:

esm wrote:

Ruby Ridge, Waco........

Word!!
 

 

Lol. You are too much Spunky.

First of all let he assure you all I don't approve of what these guys are doing. I don't think it is right.  I think calling it terrorism might be a bit strong.  And the implication in one post here was that if it weren't white men they would have been shot already or forcibly removed. This is what I took issue with.  Do you remember Waco?  Those were white people and that situation ended in violence.  I do think there is a good chance that this situation will end the same way. 

NESunrise wrote:

I'm sorry, I know this is serious but some of the comments made me LOL "snacks, Twinkies, Drones..

Hey NE...how've you been with your cold feet (you know flip flops)...lol

I had thick socks on over my jeans and boots up to my knees when I went out this morning...oh and a hat and thick scarf on too....and I still felt that wind...lol

About my drone comment...isn't that what they used on the terrorists to blast them out? Well, these crazies are terrorists and should be treated the same way.....

The food comment I guess, that's what people in the bush carry around with them in order to survive.....twinkies??? yuck I never liked them.

I say first cut the wifi, and electricity.......then threaten to  use a drone...that will get them to get out of there...

If I had NO wifi...that would be it for me.....I'd give up fast.....and have to go o the library????? no noway could I survive that....lol




 

Last edited by Spunky (1/04/2016 6:12 pm)

My cold feet are fine!! LOL I love the cold weather. All that extraneous outerwear is only for sub zero temps, oh and snow-wouldn't want frostbite

I agree about the Drones, it just appeared funny as I was reading down. Terrorists are terrorists-no special treatment. They need snacks cracked me up. Idiots -all of 'em but dangerous idiots. But they are "white patriots" (cough, cough) so more than likely they'll get their Twinkies.
Wifi I can live without, I'm strictly old school, crayons and paper type LOL

esm wrote:

needtosay wrote:

First of all let he assure you all I don't approve of what these guys are doing. I don't think it is right.  I think calling it terrorism might be a bit strong.  And the implication in one post here was that if it weren't white men they would have been shot already or forcibly removed. This is what I took issue with.  Do you remember Waco?  Those were white people and that situation ended in violence.  I do think there is a good chance that this situation will end the same way. 

It may seem a bit strong to you, but technically, thats exactly what it is.  And I dont believe they dont want it to end exactly the same way, isnt that enough to classify them as terrorists?

I agree...with esm and need....They do seem to want this showdown to end badly....

The definition of domestic terrorism from the FBI website is as follows:"Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:

• Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
• Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
• Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.

So these people hold up in a federally owned building are "terrorists" .

They are baiting the FBI and other agencies into a war with them.....that will not end in a good way for them. They want to be martyrs for this cause...that they can't win. 

Bundy (the father) knows this and yet he encourages his son to proceed with this craziness.....smh

In actuality, they are no better than those terrorists that strap bombs onto their bodies to kill many..
 

Oregon loon sends hilarious farewell message to his family.