Offline
Did anyone notice during the coverage of the YouTube shooting that they kept reporting it was a personal, domestic dispute between this woman and the man she shot? They didn't even know her name or anything about her at the time and they came up with this, she's a woman who was going after this man, scenario. Did anyone else think that was strange? It turns out the attacker, Najafi Aghdam, hated the company because she thought they were obstructing her videos from being viewed. Her family warned the police that she hated the company and might do something against them. I kept saying as I listened to the coverage, how do they know why she did this when they don't know one thing about her yet. Because she was a woman they just knew how her mind worked? I think it's men who usually can't take no for an answer from a woman and end up shooting others and themselves. I just thought it was interesting how quickly they came up with this whole scenario.
Offline
Yep, you're right Teluog. They covered it like it was a love triangle because of course its a woman. A unhinged woman but nevertheless, still a woman, so it HAS to be tied to domestic dispute.
I didn't hear until this morning that she was a vegan activist (whatever that is) and she was mad at you tube.
Offline
Wow. When I turn on the news it's either head or the weather. Missed this yesterday. What a world.
Offline
I think if anyone died beside the shooter it might have been a different story.