Image and video hosting by TinyPic

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



12/30/2023 7:25 pm  #1


Special counsel Jack Smith pushes back on the rump's...

 immunity claim!

Special counsel Jack Smith pushed back on former President Donald rump’s claim that he should be cloaked with absolute immunityfrom criminal prosecution, arguing in a new filing Saturday that the sweeping assertion “threatens to license Presidents to commit crimes to remain in office.

”Smith’s response to the rump’s immunity claim in the federal election subversion case comes ahead of oral arguments before a US appeals court in Washington, DC, which are scheduled for January 9.“The defendant asserts (Br.1) that this prosecution ‘threatens … to shatter the very bedrock of our Republic.’

To the contrary: it is the defendant’s claim that he cannot be held to answer for the charges that he engaged in an unprecedented effort to retain power through criminal means, despite having lost the election, that threatens the democratic and constitutional foundation of our Republic,” Smith wrote in the new filing.

“This Court should affirm and issue the mandate expeditiously to further the public’s — and the defendant’s — compelling interest in a prompt resolution of this case,” he added.The rump faces four counts in the case, including conspiring to defraud the United States and to obstruct an official proceeding.

The former president has pleaded not guilty. Pre-trial proceedings were temporarily put on hold in the federal election subversion case pending rump’s appeal of the district court judge’s ruling that, as a former president, he is not entitled to immunity for potential crimes he committed while in office.

The trial was initially scheduled to begin March 4; the former president’s lawyers have advocated repeatedly for the trial to take place after the 2024 presidential election in November, with the rump’s fight over the immunity claim underscoring those efforts.

District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected immunity claims from the rump and his attorneys, writing in an opinion that his “four-year service as Commander in Chief did not bestow on him the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens.”   

Last edited by Spunky (12/30/2023 7:28 pm)

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum


Image and video hosting by TinyPic