NESunrise wrote:

Apostolic Christian-check out what they believe and why Speaking in tongues is my favorite LOL

 
Some may find it beneficial to look up Christian Dominionism, New Apostilistic Reformation, Christian Reconstructionists, Quiverfull, Kingdom Now, Seven Mountain Dominionism & Christian Reconstructionists. They all want a Theocracy here in the US.

esm wrote:

AdminShiny wrote:

I bet Huckabee and Cruz are just devastated that she's allowing any licenses to be issued at all. They probably worked all weekend and nibbled their pencils to a nub trying to out-outrage eachother with their angry speeches planned for today.

She was ordered not to interfere with issuing the licenses. She has had her name taken off them and is also saying that she doesn't think they are legally binding without her name. Isn't that still interfering?

Anyway, i'm glad people in her county are getting married and Huckabee and Cruz no longer have a sacrificial cow.

I think she is still not doing her job and I wish the people of Kentucky had the stones to remove her from office. 
 

WORD! esm...this lady is totally nuts and obviously doesn't understand that it is the LAW of the land...She doesn't have to like it....just go somewhere else....I'm sure there are plenty of law abiding citizens that would like to make 80,000 a year doing that job.

....They will probably have to wait until January to remove her though,.....unfortunately!
 

Last edited by Spunky (9/14/2015 7:35 pm)

Did anyone see the recent interview Paula Faris did with Kim Davis?    I have no doubt now she is NOT just objecting over religious convictions.  If you listen to Kim's response to Farris question about "dignity"  Faris : "Why is your moral conscious more important than someone one's happiness?" Davis's  Response: " I don't think  dignity is guaranteed in the constitution".
So, she responds  with a LEGAL argument, not a religious argument.   Anytime someone begins making inconsistent  arguments , you know they are not being honest about why they think or feel a certain way.
 
I wish Faris had asked this question:  If a county clerk believes divorce is against their religion and therefore rejects a marriage license to anyone who has been married before (like Kim Davis), would you support that "religious freedom"

Last edited by danyi (9/22/2015 2:22 pm)

" BTW why does Jesus keep getting lost? Buy him a GPS already lol."

Seriously!

I think what you and Danyi have said is right on the mark. She's just another bigot hiding behind the Bible to defend her ability to discriminate.

Vantro wrote:

Doesn't she sign her name to divorce documents? Right there would be an inconsistency. She is a bigot. No ifs, ands or buts about it. She is in no position to judge or make decisions for others. Her life isn't exactly one I would strive for or want to emulate. As a matter of fact I do everything in my life to not be like her & her ilk. Divorced multiple times, lived carefree, but now that she found Jesus she thinks she can dictate other's decisions & life? A big hell no from me! BTW why does Jesus keep getting lost? Buy him a GPS already lol.

LMAO ! I used to say that as a little kid. Also fun to answer the door to those friendly types who knock and ask if you have found Jesus? Fun fave as an adult-No! I didn't know it was my turn to watch him
 

I could not resist!

Vantro wrote:

I could not resist!

 Yikes!

Megyn Kelly presented a hypothetical question asking if a Catholic or Muslim in Kim's shoes who also wanted a religious accommodation to deny a different kind of couple a marriage license.

Megyn Kelly: … The critics say this is a slippery slope. If we’re going to bend the law or the rules for one person with one set of objections, then we’re gonna have to do it for a bunch of people with other objections–

Kim Davis: So you have millions of Christians who object [to] this whole same-sex marriage issue. Are their rights invalid? Are their rights not worth anything?

I am going to start using the correct terminology for "religious freedom", but can't decide which is best. Christian Liberty? Christian sharia? Christian freedom? Let's be clear & stop hiding behind religious freedom when they mean Christian only. It is beyond obvious at this point.

NESunrise wrote:

She and her husband are now going to be Republicans !!   The democrats don't support her anymore --I am shocked !!!

*********************
lol me too,
 

The only thing that shocks me is that she was ever a Democrat in the first place.