Offline
The Bundys strike again. Does anyone not see this for what it is? Domestic terrorism?
Offline
I agree esm. I just don't inderstand how they are getting away with it.
Calling Janet Reno.
Offline
These people are not terrorists, they're patriots.
Last edited by DollyLongstaff (1/04/2016 10:49 am)
Offline
When Muslims do it, it's terrorism. When blacks do it, they're thugs.
When white boys do it, they're "ranchers" with a simple protest.
Offline
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE CRISIS IN OREGON
Offline
Offline
I want to hear big mouth Trump, who has an opinion on everything, come out and tell us what he thinks of these terrorists. The place would have been stormed already if these red-necks were anything but white, in fact I think it's safe to say they would be dead already. The republicans would be preaching about how they deserved what they got and that the trash had been taken out.
Offline
I can't believe these terroristic THUGS are getting away with this.....???? They need to be stopped NOW!
Offline
I have told my friends often, that there is a way to get the 2nd Amendment zealots to change their minds on reasonable gun laws...Have one or all of the "Dreaded Three", Jackson, Sharpton, or Farrakhan go on national tv & tell every law abiding black person in America to immediately go out & buy a minimum of one semiautomatic rifle & more if they can afford it.....I guarantee you many if not all of these gun rights folks will immediately be open to some form of gun control!!!
Only in America is an unarmed black man more of a threat than 150 white anti- government militiamen armed with an arsenal !! SMH
Offline
SEC4ever wrote:
I have told my friends often, that there is a way to get the 2nd Amendment zealots to change their minds on reasonable gun laws...Have one or all of the "Dreaded Three", Jackson, Sharpton, or Farrakhan go on national tv & tell every law abiding black person in America to immediately go out & buy a minimum of one semiautomatic rifle & more if they can afford it.....I guarantee you many if not all of these gun rights folks will immediately be open to some form of gun control!!!
Only in America is an unarmed black man more of a threat than 150 white anti- government militiamen armed with an arsenal !! SMH
Sounds like an excellent plan to me and I'm sure it would work, they think everyone should own a gun, except for the people they don't approve of, anyone who isn't just like them.
Offline
I agree SEC...And a Black 12 year old is immediately shot dead only armed with a toy gun....why people can't see the irony and prejudice in all of this is beyond reason or understanding.
Offline
They don't see, because they don't want to.
Offline
These nuts are saying that the governent took the land from ranchers & turned it into a sanctuary & they are "taking it back"....why don't they take it one step further ...after they "take it back"....give it back to the people it belonged to in the first place...Native Americans!!!!
Talk about white privilege !!!
Offline
teluog wrote:
I want to hear big mouth Trump, who has an opinion on everything, come out and tell us what he thinks of these terrorists. The place would have been stormed already if these red-necks were anything but white, in fact I think it's safe to say they would be dead already. The republicans would be preaching about how they deserved what they got and that the trash had been taken out.
I am not so sure about that. Black Lives matter took over shopping malls and airport access and no one killed any of them. It is a protest just like Black Lives Matter. The one difference being is these guys seem to doing a long term takeover whereas the BLM people only did short term take overs. Both groups are protesting things that they are wrong.
Offline
Please direct me to where armed BLM took possession of a government building to the exclusion of all others and threatened to kill anyone who tried to take it back.
Offline
They didn't take over a government building. They did close down access to an airport and stores in a mall. They have also taken over road ways and stopped traffic on them. As far as I know BLM people didn't threaten to kill anyone so you do have a point there. I think there is good chance this take over will end violently eventually.
Offline
needtosay wrote:
teluog wrote:
I want to hear big mouth Trump, who has an opinion on everything, come out and tell us what he thinks of these terrorists. The place would have been stormed already if these red-necks were anything but white, in fact I think it's safe to say they would be dead already. The republicans would be preaching about how they deserved what they got and that the trash had been taken out.
I am not so sure about that. Black Lives matter took over shopping malls and airport access and no one killed any of them. It is a protest just like Black Lives Matter. The one difference being is these guys seem to doing a long term takeover whereas the BLM people only did short term take overs. Both groups are protesting things that they are wrong.
BLM was/is an organized protest and non-violent. Do I necessary agree with their tactics: no,but they only disrupt. Still they were called thugs.
This in Oregon is a violent, armed criminal act. --- they are called patriots? ?
Wow just wow!
Offline
needtosay wrote:
They didn't take over a government building. They did close down access to an airport and stores in a mall. They have also taken over road ways and stopped traffic on them. As far as I know BLM people didn't threaten to kill anyone so you do have a point there. I think there is good chance this take over will end violently eventually.
====
What do you call the buildings on the Malheur Wildlife Refuge? The refuge is owned by the federal government & they have taken occupation of all the buildings on the refuge & are heavily armed & have stated on several interviews that they will kill or be killed..,They have also asked others to arm themselves & join them in their efforts to "fight federal tyranny".
.And I guess you believe if BLM had shown up at the airport & mall armed to the hilt & threatening to kill people that opposed them, they would still be alive or that many conservatives would be defending their 2nd Amendment rights to bear arms?
Offline
The group in Oregon is not protesting! They have threatened violence if anyone tries to remove them from the building! They are using threats of violence & intimidation, which are acts of terrorism.
Definitions of Terrorism in the U.S. Code
18 U.S.C. § 2331 defines "international terrorism" and "domestic terrorism" for purposes of Chapter 113B of the Code, entitled "Terrorism”:
"International terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:
Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.*
"Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:
Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.
18 U.S.C. § 2332b defines the term "federal crime of terrorism" as an offense that:
Is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and
Is a violation of one of several listed statutes, including § 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a federal facility with a dangerous weapon); and § 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the U.S.).
Last edited by Vantro (1/04/2016 4:43 pm)
Offline
I say send in a DRONE....The end...